|
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 |
shape of a saddle, or any other three dimensional shape, is not the answer to Einstein's theory. So let's try to see if we can come up with something which makes some sense. We are not saying this is what Einstein meant; we are just attempting a possible explanation. God forbid we should try to understand Albert. But, before we attempt a more complicated explanation, let's do, for now, accept that any attempt to reach the outer edge of the universe by a traveler is going to be subject to universal gravitation. This means while traveling in the attempt to go outward, gravitational pull will be pulling on the attempt, and while it appears that the attempt is going in a straight line, it is going more like a comet in our solar system. It ends up more like an elliptical orbit, going back nearly to the point of origin. Now let us try a more thoughtful approach to the problem. Let us go back to the Big Bang, which is called that because we can compare it to all which has happened since, and it certainly was a big bang. However at the time it occurred there was nothing to compare it to, and it could have been referred to as the big burp. (Another reason why it was a wise thing to read this paper.) Anyway, back at the Big Bang (Burp), let us consider a one dimension universe being created. We typically think of a long straight line of only a forward and back movement, with the Big Bang having occurred in the middle. But it could not happen that way. (________.________) By that we mean, the Big Bang happening where the period is, and the end result is a one dimensional universe continuing from one end of the line to the other, through the period. In order for things to happen that way the Big Bang would have been a continuous explosion, constantly creating the one dimensional universe in both directions, until the Big Bang quit banging. But we are told it was one Big Bang, and not a continuous explosion. That means that instead of a continuous straight line forward and back. It would have kicked off two singularities in both directions. (. . .) The Big Bang occurring where the middle period is, with the two singularities where the outside periods are. While a singularity may contain any number of any dimensional universes, it is not what we are looking for. (But please remember this example because, as you have probably already guessed, it is a very intriguing concept.) So how do we get a one dimensional universe? We have a Big Bang. As you know, an explosion can give off some thing like a, for lack of a better term, smoke ring. (O) Now, put the Big Bang in the middle of that circle which is expanding outward. Nobody said a one dimensional universe had to be a straight line. That circle is a one dimension line going only forward and back, around where the Big Bang (Burp) took place. Therefore, it has the qualifications for a one dimensional universe. A one dimension creature says, "I wonder where the edge of my universe is". And he starts walking until he reaches the edge. But lo and behold, he ends up where he started. He is completely ...... continued on next page Previous Page <-> Next Page |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||