Here are my comments in response to an article titled: "All-grain brewing vs extract brewing: Is it really cheaper?" -- found at http://www.fermentarium.com/content/view/178/58/ -- which comments are posted here because the above blog does not provide enough room for my reply, ... which I did not discover until only after I spent a lot of my time drafting it.

This was the immediately prior post from DJBrew:
I would be interested in hearing your criticism, if you have time. We only censor spam here.

... and now my reply to him:

Thanks. There are several things in your post that I strongly disagree with, but also a lot that I do agree with too, so I probably expressed myself more harshly than I should have; sorry about that.  I had just returned from a big party of beer and Texas Hold'em; my wife was my designated driver.  Anyway, here are my comments after more 'sober' reflection, and this is going to be long so I hope there is no word limit.

First, I think that comparisons based on Northern Brewer is probably very much out of line with common all grain brewing costs; except for occasional posts that I read about on the Internet, EVERY all grain brewer I know purchases in bulk. I haven't had to go to my LHBS since before Christmas so I don't know how much prices have changed; I'll probably make a trip in April and might be shocked, but for purposes of this post I will use the prices I paid in November.

I purchased 200 pounds of Cargill 2-row pale malt; the price was $37.00/50#, with an extra $3.00 if pre-crushed (if you don't have a malt mill); I also purchased some hops by the pound, and I grow hops, too, which reduce costs, but that won't matter for comparisons of extract versus all grain.  The cost for most specialty grains (crystals and roasts) was two bucks a pound. Packaged 'flaked' grains like barley or rye were $2.00/lb. The price of hops and yeast is the same for both extract and all grain brewing, but I'll mention the price for purposes of comparing my costs to kits; hops were $2.50/ounce and I mostly use dry yeast (Safale US-05 or Nottingham) at $2.00/11g sachet -- while White labs is about $6.00/vial.  In any case, I always build a starter, even from a single packet of dry yeast, which is then divided for my entire brew session, which is usually two batches or sometimes three batches in one day, often as partigyles.  But again, starters can be used for extract brewing, too, so I'll just figure an average cost of $1.00 for yeast per batch (although it does take some work, but then this is my hobby).

I'll compare my all grain costs with the cost of the kit for Oatmeal Stout, which is one of my favorites, and I'll use the crushed grain costs in case newbies have no mill.

Oatmeal Stout -- KIT = $24.50 ... PLUS shipping (BrewSaver Ground @ $7.99 is the cheapest way to my Zip) for a total cost of $32.49 for a 5-gallon batch.
 
Inventory and what MY cost is:

Kit has 6.5 lbs. Crisp Maris Otter (6.5# Cargill x $.80/# = $5.20 ... OR ... MarisOtter @ $66.00/50# = 6.5# M.O. x $1.32 = $8.58).

1 lb. Flaked Oats (I use regular oatmeal at a buck/pound = $1.00).

0.5 lb. EACH of Roasted Barley, Chocolate Malt, and Dark Crystyal (1.5# x $2.00/lb for specialty malts = $3.00).

1 oz. of Glacier hops (my cost is $2.50 from my LHBS).

Wyeast #1084 (I usually use a dry yeast instead, but whether dry or liquid I would usually split it, too, but I'll go with the full-price for my liquid vial just to compare what we actually get -- my cost would then be $6.00).

Using Maris Otter and a full vial of liquid yeast, my total cost is $21.08 compared to $32.49 for a kit shipped to me from Northern Brewer -- a difference of $11.41.  A similar recipe using my usual ingredients of Cargill 2-row and half a pack of Safale US-05, PLUS an extra two ounces of hops that Northern Brewer doesn't provide, costs me just $17.70 -- a difference of $14.79 from N.B., or little more than HALF the cost of a kit -- and my Oatmeal Stout is excellent.  So my first problem with your post is that I don't think you use realistic figures for most all grain brewers.  At the relatively higher cost of kits, I just can't imagine very many serious all grainers buying them -- even if the kits are still 'all grain'.  I also use computer software and design my own recipes and experiment a lot; I think that makes for a much more interesting hobby, but that's just my opinion. I realize that you can still add other stuff to a kit to experiment, but that doesn't make a lot of sense to me; why buy a 'kit' in the first place is you're going to change it?

Next, I take serious issue with your description of necessary equipment and costs.  Starting with the kettle, you suggest a 10 gallon kettle is needed at a cost of "between $100-$200 USD".  YIKES!!!  I have two different 30-quart 'turkey fryer' pots -- one aluminum and one stainless -- and that size seems pretty standard; I know a LOT of all grainers who use them, and I would even venture to say that, outside of converted kegs, turkey fryers are probably the most popular kettles.  Thirty-quarts is 7.5 gallons, and with the typical 6 gallon or less pre-boil volume, they are more than adequate.  I have never had a boil-over and flame out that was due to anything other than my own neglect for not watching the pot.  If you watch it until hot break formation ends, and properly adjust the boil rate, it will not boil over even with a very vigorous boil rate of the usually recommended 10% boil-off rate per hour.  Turkey fryer pots come in a package which includes the propane burner and regulator, too, but usully not the tank.  If you're lucky, the entire set without tank can be obtained for from $30 to $40.00; just before Christmas, Bass-Pro shop was selling sets for $29.00, IIRC, and I have also seen them in department stores, etc., on sale OFTEN for less than fifty bucks.  The tank will probably cost another $20.  Therefore, with a bit of careful shopping, I would expect you to be able to purchase an adequate 30-quart pot, propane burner, and tank, for less than $75.00 and perhaps even for less than $50.00.

Next you talk about a mash tun, and probably scare away a few more folks by even mentioning an "all-grain continuous sparging system made from two rubber maid coolers for $249.99 USD."  YIKES!!! ... again.  I don't know ANYONE who uses such a thing, and even your estimated costs for batch sparging are very high to me.  And I think that such high over-estimates of the cost for equipment can only be a serious disservice to our craft because I fear it will only chase away people who are considering all grain brewing.  

Now, I use a 48-quart Coleman ice-chest that I actually salvaged from the trash because my wife said it was getting too old looking and the top wasn't closing right; I filled it with boiling water to soften the sides a bit,  dumped it, and cooled it off with the lid closed and it now works like a charm, but I digress.  Walmart sells a Rubbermaid 48 Qt. Victory Ice Chest for just $14.98, which should work just as well as mine (http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5623411).  Is that large enough?  Well, I've mashed 26 pounds of grain at one time, which will make a full 5-gallon batch of as strong a barleywine as you could want, or a TRIPLE partigyle (been there and done that, too) of a nice range of beers. A 70-quart tun will be nice if I ever get around to a larger brewing setup such as keg-conversions on tiers or RIMS or HERMS, but MOST all grainers I know are using either 10 gallon (40 quart) round beverage coolers or ice chests that are much closer to my size.

Next we come to your estimated costs for  a "Cooler Conversion Kit -- $29.99" and "Bazooka Screen    -- $20.50".  First, what is a 'cooler conversion kit' and why is it necessary?  Let me say that I purchased a ten-foot long washing-machine hose reinforced with stainless steel mesh tubing from Lowe's for just about ten bucks, IIRC, although that was several years ago and no doubt costs more now, but probably not as much as your bazooka. The couple of feet of plastic hose that is also needed to complete the tun is less than a buck.

I know most brewers who use much shorter mesh hoses which are also cheaper, but I wanted a monster; I cut both ends off with a hacksaw, stripped back some mesh from one end to expose about an inch of rubber hose, clamped that end in a bench-vise, and slowly stroked the mesh from the vise to the other end, over and over again, until it slipped off.  Easy.  You can NOT "pull" the mesh off because it will constrict (tighten against the rubber); instead, you need to "push" it off, thus the repeated 'stroking' motions, to slowly move the slack down the hose.  I really don't think the whole process took more than 15 minutes. I then stuck a piece of wood dowel in one end, and didn't even bother to add a clamp; I've used it for maybe a hundred batches or so, and it has never come out.  I still use the Coleman ice chest for cooling beer for parties, too; when I want to use it for a tun, I just open the drain cap, slip some standard plastic tube through the drain, which fits snuggly, cram the open end of my mesh tube onto the plastic hose and coil the mesh in the bottom of the ice chest.  I then take a few inches of teflon tape and wrap the plastic tube where it enters the ice chest drain -- I don't recall ever seeing so much as a drip.  The other end of the plastic hose is simply elevated and stuck through the ice chest handle which acts as a clamp to hold it in place until it needs to be lowered to drain.  I use NO valve/spigot or hose clamps, and have never had a mishap; just four parts -- ice chest, mesh hose, plastic hose, and teflon tape.  Very simple, cheap, and it works great; I've been using it for years.  When I dump my spent grain onto my compost pile, I just 'yank' the plastic tube out first so that the mesh tube is free to drop out of the ice chest with the spent grain; this keeps it from stretching, bending, or kinking, like it probably would if firmly fastened with a clamp, and then I just easily fish it out of the grain.  I have mashed with oatmeal, rye, boiled rice, and even ordinary bread flour, and have never used any rice hulls, but I have NEVER had a stuck sparge (knock on wood), and my run-off is about as fast as the drain opening will allow.  Vorlauf is simple; I drain the entire tun into a plastic bucket, set a plastic plate on top of the grain bed to break the fall of the sweet wort when it is poured back into the tun so it will not disrupt the grain bed, and then I just drain.  I detect no effects from 'hot-side aeration', and I get very clear runnings.  I then batch sparge and repeat the vorlauf and runnings until finished.  I average about 80% efficiency, which is good enough for me.

I agree with you on the wort chiller; it is vital, and with the price of copper going up, they are much more expensive.  I've read several posts where people have been able to buy ready-made counter-flow chillers cheaper than they could buy the parts, due mainly to copper coil prices.  Anyway, it still can be done at an affordable price; years ago I bought just 20' of 3/8" copper coil for about six or seven bucks, plus the 'spring'-like bending tool (probably a couple of bucks), and I made my own immersion chiller in probably just a couple of minutes.  Longer tubing would definitely be better, but 20' is all I have but I can still drop a 5-gallon batch from boiling to pitching temp in about a half hour; this is fast enough to prevent the formation of any noticeable dimethyl sulfide (DMS).  The way it works is that I elevate my bottling bucket which is filled with crushed ice and water, and let it gravity drain through my coil and back out into the sink.  The disadvantage is that I have to keep filling the bucket with cold water, which gets a little tedious, but its no real big deal.  The complete setup is bottling bucket on top of a plastic milk crate, short length of plastic hose from the bucket valve to one end of my chiller which is in the kettle, and a longer piece of plastic hose from the other end of the chiller down into the sink; no clamps are used -- the water is not under pressure and the hose doesn't even try to come off.  So, what would that setup cost today?  I haven't checked the local home improvement stores, but http://tinyurl.com/2nckas has a 25' length (5' LONGER than mine) for $24.99, and you should already have a bottling bucket; the extra plastic hose is less than a buck.

Then you say "The last item in the 'highly recommended' list is a propane burner.  These cost around $50 USD to $60 USD."  Again, the turkey fryer kits already come with one, although they are typically not very high capacity, so you can have trouble using one for a ten gallon batch or on very cold windy days -- but they will still do a good job in most instances.  On cold days in the winter, I pre-heat my wort on the kitchen stove to make use of the residual heat inside the house, and then carry the wort to the propane burner outside after it comes to a boil.  My turkey fryer burner can manage to sustain the boil even on cold days in winter, although a wind break is definitely very helpful if it is windy (but that's easy and cheap enough to do).

You didn't mention a malt mill, which is not actually 'necessary' because most suppliers will crush the grain for a little extra cost, but they are handy to have; however, that is an optional investment that can certainly wait until later.

You mention that all grain requires less hops than extracts; I have never heard of that before, and it defies my understanding.  Can you explain that?  I presume you are basing this on lower hop utilization for higher gravity concentrated-boils versus regular full-volume boils, which is likely to be true to some degree; however, concentrated versus full-volume boils have nothing to do with 'extract' versus 'all grain', unless you are speaking of just being 'able' to do concentrated boils for extracts, versus 'needing' to do full-volume for all grain.

You finally do acknowledge, late in your article, that all grain can be even cheaper when buying in bulk, but I think by then that most readers are probably persuaded that all grain is not much more economical than extract, especially considering the capital investment and extra time.  Time-wise, I think that all grain adds, at the most, two extra hours, including all the extra work, from weighing the grain to cleaning the tun; I typically mash for just 45 minutes, and all the vorlaufs and batch sparges take perhaps 20 minutes for a double batch (two five-gallon partigyles).

I do, however, wholly agree with your final comments: that "The real reason you want to switch to all-grain is for the control over your brews and ultimately to make better beer", and that "If you want to make better beer, all-grain is the way to go."

By the way, before moving to all grain, I did extract brewing for several years using BULK extract shipped to me in 60 pound 5-gallon buckets.  I never got the attenuation I wanted/expected, and it was hard to work with to be creative, requiring mini-mashes which all seemed to add up to even more work than all grain.  Having brewed for over ten years, I can't recommend all grain enough.  Much of what you need you would want to get eventually even for extract brewing -- such as a full-sized kettle (e.g., a turkey fryer which you can use for frying and boiling crawdads, too -- I do it all the time), a bottling bucket, at least a minimal immersion chiller, and a full-size ice chest that you can use for beer parties, too.  Really, the only extra thing that you'll buy that has no other purpose is the hose for the mesh-tubing, and a little bit of plastic hose.

Sorry this was so long, and I hope it helps some homebrewers.  By the way, if it isn't inappropriate to mention, I am the founder of 'Grow-Hops' which now has over 1,750 members, so if anyone wants to learn about growing their own hops, please check it out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Grow-Hops

Cheers.

Bill Velek
3/30/08

********* MY FOLLOW-UP RESPONSE TO http://www.fermentarium.com/content/view/179 IS BELOW ***********

I just have a few final comments:

1.  You are correct that it would be more accurate to compare BULK extract brewing with BULK all-grain brewing, but the problem is that buying bulk extract is not that easy.  Some LHBS have large drums, but I don't think they probably sell at 'bulk' prices; on-line sources were very difficult to find some years ago, and I really can't recall where I bought my 60 pound buckets from, but I just happened upon it.  I don't have the time to try now, but I think we can all at least agree that it is 'less available' than grain in LARGE bulk.  Sure, there are places that will sell LME in either gallon or two gallon packages, but the last I looked I don't feel those prices are what I'd consider 'bulk'.  DME is, I think, probably completely out of the question due to price, even if you find a 50 pound sack.  As for those 60 pound buckets I bought, I would dump a shot of vodka on top after each use to try to help sanitize it, but invariably I would always begin to encounter mold on the surface as I would get near the bottom of the bucket.  I would scrape it off, and that _might_ be okay, but it sure isn't very appetizing, and I'd usually end up tossing the very last of each bucket, which just raises the price more.  Also, IIRC, LHBS purge their drums with some sort of gas, either nitrogen or CO2 (can't remember), which I wasn't doing, so I don't know if that was affecting my beer.  But the bottom line is that you are correct that extract brewing, if you can find it in bulk, would probably reduce all-grain savings substantially.

2.  You mentioned that you're not sure where you can get a propane tank for $20 USD; if you are willing to shop around or wait for a sale, I'm sure you can get one at that price.  But if you can't do that, you can pay a few dollars more such as $22.84 for one that I can buy at my local Sam's club http://tinyurl.com/36zfd8 or $24.98 at my local Lowe's http://tinyurl.com/3ydslt

3.  As for MacGuyver'ing it with a bung, I just used a size of tube that was tight-fitting within the ice-chest drain, and I wound a short piece of teflon tape around the tube and the drain itself; works perfect, so I can't see any newbie being frustrated.

4.  Regarding thermal efficiency of my tun, it usually drops about 4 degrees F during the 45 minutes I mash; some of that is probably due to heat still being absorbed by the thermal mass of the tun by the time dough-in is finished and I put the lid on.  I don't worry about it; I could aim for 2 degrees higher than target, and then my mash would more or less 'average' my target temperature over the course of my mash.  I don't think any of that really matters so long as we are consistent in what we do.

I realize that someone can probably always propose a cheaper alternative no matter what we say, but you were suggesting a likely need to invest maybe hundreds of dollars, whereas I was showing that it can be done for about a hundred bucks in the worst case where you will need to buy a turkey fryer (pot and burner), propane tank, ice chest, and braided hose -- and for as little as maybe just ten bucks if all you need is the braided hose -- plus I get multiple duty out of my equipment: my ice chest is still just an ice chest that I can use for other things, and I also fry turkeys (they are excellent if you've never had one) and boil crawdads in my turkey fryer.  A 10-gallon pot probably doesn't come with the accessories that you need for those extra benefits: the support, lifting hook, and thermometer for the turkey, and a basket for the crawdads (or catfish, fries, and hush puppies).  And even after frying something in oil, cleaning the pot well enough to still have good head retention is not really a problem -- mostly just long soaks with hot soapy water, some slight elbow grease, and some very good rinsing.

Cheers.

Bill Velek
3/31/08